Posts Tagged ‘seo’

Back from SMX East …. and a Few Other Things

September 29, 2011

I was at SMX East very briefly. I sandwiched in a 36-hour stint in The Big Apple in between a family mini-vacation in La Jolla (sweet!) and a trip to Chile to work with our development team down there – very nice place, Chile – never been there before. SMX was great as usual, as I got to catch up with some old friends as well as make some new ones. Shout out to Frank Grasso (new friend) and Mark Knowles (old friend) – we had a great time one evening at Ramblas tapas bar in the West Village.

I had the privilege of speaking on two panels with some really great folks, and I think the audience was pretty into it. They asked a lot of thoughtful and sophisticated questions. When I got back, I wrote a piece on Search Engine Land that recaps the two panels. As always I welcome any critique or criticism on these two topics – I always tell folks that I’m passionate about this stuff and I could go on and on for hours talking about it. Look me up, people!

Next-Level Optimization Part 2: Beyond Paid Search

October 19, 2010

I had to wait on this one until our Q3 earnings release – otherwise it would have gone live yesterday. I’m getting more structure around my thoughts on Next-Level Optimization – here’s how it goes:

How do I know if my media mix is optimized?

If I had another dollar, in which channel would I spend it, and why?

Am I giving search marketing too much credit? Not enough credit?

At SMX East in New York last week there was quite a buzz about attribution management, which I though played right into my column for this month.

Last month we took a look at next-level optimization for paid search, identifying some ways to leverage targeting options and automated algorithms to ensure your paid search campaigns are well optimized. Now its time to take a look outside the friendly confines of paid search programs and see what it takes to up-level your optimization efforts by considering media other than paid search.

Don’t Panic, It’s Organic

First up is the most obvious media channel, paid search’s benevolent brother, organic search. A few months ago I took a look at a framework through which we could better understand the interaction between paid and organic search. In that post we tried to answer the specific question: If I rank #1 organically for my brand term, why should I be buying it through paid search? It turns out this approach applies beyond just brand terms.  There are many ways in which your paid search campaigns can inform your SEO, and vice versa. As an example, we sometimes comb our referral logs for organic search keywords as a source of paid search keyword growth. Conversely, if we see a paid search term driving volume with solid performance, we may choose to build content around that keyword for SEO. Going back to our previous question, you can always test the effect on your SEO of buying a head keyword using the framework we built last time around – the most important thing to remember here is to try to use a common analytics platform on which to build your analyses. Remember that different platforms will often provide very divergent data points, and thus comparing data from disparate platforms will often provide useless if not misleading data.

One Step Beyond

Outside of paid and organic search, there is a whole sub-industry developing as we speak around attribution analysis and management, and media mix modeling. I wrote a column about it several months ago where we looked at a three-phased approach to attribution management. Companies are lining up to try to tackle these issues, but doing so requires a level of integration not easily achieved in the world in which I operate. There is a very fundamental issue that normally gets in the way of doing good work on this front, which is that most companies are unable to track all their media with a common technology platform. More and more websites are beginning to see the importance of this, are taking note and making changes, but with many large companies there is still a significant analytical void to be filled. The fact remains that in order to conduct meaningful analyses, you need good web analytics. By ‘good’ I mean that you should have a single source of truth for all media, built on solid technology (whether in-house or outsourced), with the ability to track all the way up to the impression level (this is normally not available with search, as the engines generally do not support third-party ad serving, but if you can get this at least for display advertising, you’re well ahead of the game).

Be Responsible

As I mentioned in my previous column on attribution management, there are three important phases: business intelligence, statistical modeling, and actionable outcomes. And while I do believe that as a marketer your responsibility is to fully engage in every phase of this process, as someone who has been in search marketing for more than a decade I don’t recommend doing any of this on your own. There are a handful of qualified companies specializing in this business and you can bet there will be many more popping up in the near future. But to pretend that as an above-average marketer you can effectively determine how to assign credit across media channels is absolutely irresponsible. It’s like giving me the keys to a Formula One racecar and saying ‘well, you have a driver’s license, you can figure it out’. Don’t do it. What you should do is research vendors in this space and spend your time making sure you can put the necessary pieces together to make a tight business case internally. Ask vendor candidates for case studies that show lift in profit, revenue, or other important metrics. Get your analytics in shape. Understand your own business better. Only then can you effectively put a plan into place that will drive business success through next-level optimization.

Sell, Sell, Sell

OK, so now you have everything set up for success. Your analytics platform is robust and unified. You’ve RFPed some vendors, made a business case for attribution management, maybe you even have a vendor selected and have a purchase order open. Congratulations! Now you have one more critical step to take, and its time to put your sales hat on. In one large company where I have worked, we developed a very sophisticated attribution model in which we had a high level of confidence. The problem we then faced was that we couldn’t effectively sell it around the organization. There were two main reasons for this. First, the complexity of the model made it difficult for people to understand  – this is serious math, and frankly people aren’t going to get it. Second, and perhaps most significantly, attribution management means taking credit away from one channel and giving it to another. (The scary truth is that in most scenarios we will be taking credit away from search and moving it up the stack to other events such as display impressions or email). This literally means that search (or other) marketers stand to lose credit, and therefore budget, by engaging in next-level attribution management strategies. This will inevitably cause friction and impede your progress.

What’s a marketer to do? As far as selling the complexity of the attribution model, that’s one of the reasons you’ve outsourced the project. Place the burden of proof squarely on the shoulders of the vendor – don’t bear this cross yourself.  Call the engagement a ‘pilot’ if you need to – if it doesn’t work, you can always terminate the relationship, right? As far as the other question – the part where you’re stealing budget from other (or your own) channels, the way to overcome this is to have a higher-level ally or sponsor in your organization who sits on top of all the marketing channels. If you CMO or SVP believes that attribution management will benefit the company, that may be all the air cover you’ll need.

The path to next-level optimization through attribution management is a long and winding road. Take your time pre-selling the concepts to upper management, and focus on finding the right outsource partner. If you can do that, you’ll find that navigating this tricky path isn’t so tough after all.

Forget Search!

July 27, 2010

Tough to find my voice after the blitz that was the ‘Alliance Piece’, but I managed to muster up some creativity (with the help of a tall Highland Park). I think it turned out OK, thanks to an inspiring BlueGlassLA conference last week. Here’s how it goes…

If you have an extra hour in your very busy workday day, don’t spend it fine tuning your site for algo search, or optimizing your SEM campaigns for efficiency, ROI, or profitability. Spend it building out and executing on your social media strategy. I know, shocking advice coming from an old search jockey like me, but I mean it. Seriously, how much cash are you really going to squeeze out of your already-optimized site or SEM program compared to the huge opportunities in front of you in social media?

Let me take a half-step back. First of all, I just finished a monster piece on the Yahoo! Microsoft Search Alliance detailing the upcoming transitions for advertisers and publishers, and I’m admittedly a teensy bit weary from the experience. Not complaining, mind you, it was a great opportunity and hopefully a decent column, it’s just left me with a bit of a search hangover, if you will. Secondly, while I was making the final edits to the Alliance piece, I was attending BlueGlass LA in Marina Del Rey. Chris, Dave, Brent and the rest of the gang did a bang-up job and we ended up in an intimate setting with an all-star cast of talent and an incredibly savvy and engaged audience. What struck me at the conference was not only that search marketing had clearly established itself in the mainstream of digital marketing, but also that the tactics around SEM and SEO had somehow suddenly become mind-numbingly complex and sophisticated. Don’t get me wrong, I could sit and talk all afternoon with Kris Roadruck about how to legitimately bootstrap link authority through strategic content in a competitive SEO space (and nearly did). And, I was proud as the proverbial peacock when at the conference I presented my favorite graph that shows positive statistical synergy between paid and organic search. However, it occurred to me as I nibbled on a chocolate-covered macaroon at lunch on Tuesday, that at some point in the last several years, likely when I was busy building infrastructure to support automated keyword bidding algorithms, we not only reached the point of diminishing returns, we shot past it a warp speed and kept right on going into outer space.

Let me be clear. I’m not suggesting that anyone ignore paid search or SEO. I’m still search marketing’s number one fan, and I’ll be the first to chastise any marketer for leaving search out of the mix (if Melanie Mitchell doesn’t beat me to it). But what became so abundantly clear to me as I polished off that last bite of macaroon was that there is so much ‘white space’ in social media compared to search marketing, that the real challenge in a resource constrained world is to understand when you’ve optimized your search efforts to the point that the next hour of your work life would be better spent on something else.

Social media is today what search marketing was ten years ago when I started. It’s completely wide open. BlueGlass is a prime example of how search marketers and social media-types are teaming up to exploit the enormous opportunities that arise when the lines between search and social begin to blur. I’m not going to go into great detail about social media tactics, and I’m not (yet) going to pretend I’m an expert at it. There are plenty of folks who are dropping massive amounts of free social media knowledge on us. What I’m suggesting is you spend just a little (more) time researching, communicating, and trying a few new things in social. Dip your toes in the social media pool and see how the water feels. If you don’t, pretty soon you’ll be lagging behind the curve, just like all the search marketing nay-sayers of the last decade.

Paid and Organic Search: Lift, Cannibalism, or Both?

March 9, 2010

‘Why are we buying our brand keyword when we already rank #1 in the organic results?’ ‘Why are we paying for traffic if we’re already getting it for free??’ It turns out that the question isn’t whether or not you should be buying your brand keywords. The question is how much should you be willing to pay for that ad, and what should it say

For search marketers like me (and probably you), the question of the paid/organic dynamic has been around for years. So why is there such an amazing dearth of good information on this topic? Why isn’t there any kind of industry-accepted framework with which to address the age-old question?

I believe that the reason for this is that the conversation around the interaction between paid and organic search has historically been sorely lacking any good data. As a result, we get stuck talking about opinions and assumptions, and we typically don’t come to any meaningful conclusions. I am grateful that at this point in my career, I am surrounded by savvy marketers who understand how search results pages (SRPs) work. They understand that the SRP is a complex landscape, that each link has its own clickthrough rate (CTR), and that any link’s CTR is affected by the other links with which it shares the SRP. This is the path to meaningful dialogue on the subject, so I encourage everyone to get intimately familiar with the data around the paid/organic dynamic.

So how do we look at the data in a way that can help us understand this phenomenon? First let’s get a few ground rules straight:

  1. What keywords are we really talking about? Those that match exactly with your brand name or branded product name, where there is generally no competition. So if you are the Acme Widget Company we would be talking about keywords like ‘acme’ and potentially ‘acme widget’.
  2. What are we actually trying to compare? Ultimately we want to compare two different conditions: a) a SRP where the organic link for brand kw is ranked #1 with no PPC ad (and no competitors’ ads) present and b) a SRP where the organic link for a brand kw is ranked #1 with a #1 rank PPC ad (and no competitors’ ads)
  3. What phenomena are we trying to measure? In the above cases there are two things that normally happen. I call them cannibalization and lift. ‘Lift’ is the net amount of traffic that is added to the mix by virtue of the PPC ad. Cannibalization is the portion of PPC ad traffic that comes at the expense of the organic link. If you can quantify cannibalization and lift in any situation, you can then begin to think intelligently about what to do.

One thing we need to also acknowledge is the fact that the many variables affecting paid and organic search traffic – search volume, page layout, keyword bids and rankings – prevent us from doing any rigorous scientific testing around the paid/organic dynamic. It’s simply impossible to isolate all the variables necessary to completely understand what’s going on. However, there are some terrific ways that you can at least gather some meaningful data that can be interpreted and analyzed, and from which we can actually draw very useful and actionable conclusions.

Next, let’s agree on a few basic principles:

  1. Internet (and search) traffic patterns move in weekly cycles
  2. Search volume is affected by seasonality, media, and other factors
  3. You’ll want to ‘test’ in a period of minimum volatility (avoid holidays and seasonal peaks and dips if possible)

Now, consider the following approaches to gather the data required to quantify cannibalization and lift:

  1. On/off weekly: Pause your paid ads for one week and then resume. This is the simplest approach and takes the least amount of time. If you have more time, try alternating weeks as long as you need.
  2. On/off daily: For a two week period, alternate pausing and activating your paid ads on consecutive days. Why two weeks? This is the minimum duration required to get both ‘on’ and ‘off’ data for each day of the week.

These are just examples. Use your imagination to design something more elegant if you have more time or budget.

Now What?

Now, you need to gather your data and estimate your lift and cannibalization. The incredibly tricky (and potentially inaccurate) part of this is trying to establish a baseline for organic traffic. Naturally, you will want to use the organic traffic during ‘off’ periods as a baseline, but what about the ‘on’ periods? What would the organic traffic have been without the paid ads present? For this you will need a third data point. Either use averages of organic traffic during ‘off’ periods that bookend an ‘on’ period, or if you have access to data like search volume for a given keyword, you can use this trend to estimate what your organic baseline should be.

The key here is to come up with an approximation for cannibalization and lift. It doesn’t have to be perfect, because you’re going to use this data to determine, based on your business goals, what you should be willing to pay for a click on your PPC ad. Here’s an example:

Let’s use a day’s worth of data, and suppose we determine that our organic baseline traffic is 100 clicks. When we add a PPC ad, that ad provides us with 100 clicks, but when we do so, our total organic+paid total is only 180 clicks. That means that of the 100 PPC clicks we bought, 80 were ‘lift’, and the other 20 were ‘cannibalization’. Then, all other things being equal, you should discount your maximum allowable CPC on your brand keyword by 20% to account for the cannibalization, and adjust your bids accordingly. Make sense?

Now let’s look at the extremes. If your PPC traffic is 100% lift, then you can confidently say that buying your brand terms is absolutely justified, and you have the data to prove it. What, then, if all your PPC traffic is cannibalized organic traffic? If that’s the case, then you had better have an incredibly good reason for paying for the PPC ads. One reason might be that you want to put a differentiated message in front of people, a message that’s not reflected in your organic link. Possible reasons for this might be a brand re-launch or a strategic event like an important product launch or corporate milestone.

This may sound complicated, but I can assure you it’s both do-able and worthwhile. I just completed a study for one of our keywords and I can tell you that I am ecstatic about the results. I can’t wait to share them around the company! Good Luck!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.